Vaccination Liberation - Information
Legal: Science: Misc: Searches:

Package Inserts
Ingredients of Vaccines
Artificially Sweetened Times
Books Videos Tapes
100+ Anti-Vax links
Breaking News
Smallpox Alert!

Q. How long has human originated vaccination been practiced?
3500 years! (or more)
The following is quoted from: VACCINE and SERUM EVILS by Herbert M. Shelton
Available from Health Research Books, PO Box 850, Pomeroy, WA 99347

I mentioned that the inoculation practice was introduced from the east. The date of the origin of this superstitious practice is hidden in the darkness of pre-history. Savage and barbaric peoples, in various parts of the world, practiced inoculation. It is thought to have started in India, where so many of our superstitions originated, and spread from there to Africia and Europe.

From time immemorial the negroes and Arabs of Nubia practiced inoculation against small-pox. The Ashantees and the Moorish and Arab tribes in Northern Africa practiced arm to arm inoculation from ancient times. Savage tribes of the Upper Congo practiced it to prevent "syphilis." The Baris of Lado inoculated themselves over the left breast. The negroes in Senegal inoculated their children on the arms. The Moors and Pouls of Senegambia practiced inoculation against pleuro-pneumonia. A practice of this kind was in vogue in Berne, Switzerland in the 18th century.

The first record of smallpox seems to be in India, where also is the first record of inoculation, where the practice was in vogue over three thousand years ago. Dhanwantari, the Vedic father of medicine, and the earliest known Hindu physician, supposed to have lived in 1500 B.C., is said to have been the first to practice inoculation and it is also stated that the Hindus employed a vaccine. For over a thousand years inoculation has been practiced in China.

... Inoculation seems to have been nothing more than a superstitious rite designed to placate and appease the wrath of an irrascible deity. People who imagined all their sufferings were sent upon them because they had offended some of their gods or goddesses originated the filthy rite to get the goddess into a good humor again.

Well there you have the quick sketch of vaccine history. We will have more to say on the 1600-2000 time period elsewhere. Now-a-days, of course, the smallpox goddess has been renamed "Herd Immunity" and we still sacrifice children to this goddess even though the goddess still claims members of 100% vaccinated populations!

What success stories are connected with historical vaccination/inoculation?

Q.Success stories?
Well, thats strange, only after sanitation and nutrition was changed in modern times does 'vaccine propaganda' finally get to claim a "success". Sanitation and nutrition are the basic causes of modern relatively disease free areas. See Plague for more info
Back to 50+ Q & A

How long has non-human originated vaccination [Innoculation] been practiced?

Q.How long have humans, ticks, fleas and mosquitos co-existed?
The answer to that question is the length of time humans have been exposed to non-human inoculation. Has this non-human inoculation been of benefit to humanity? The party line is that such inoculation is harmful to health and of course since the sellers of insecticide and rat traps make money from keeping this idea alive, no serious effort is made to claim that non-human inoculation is beneficial. And we also will certainly NOT claim any benefits for tick, flea and mosquito inoculation. Our question is, how can human made mixes of vaccine be as 'good as' an insect byte? See next question.

Back to 50+ Q & A

Human versus non-human inoculation, which is best?

Q.Is a doctors vaccination superior to a mosquito's bite?
Since the inoculation of insects siliva is 'bad for the health', we should avoid doctors vaccination even more. Unfortunately, the vaccinators claim their product is passed through several hosts which "weakens" the virus making the vaccine challenge to the body easier and thus more certain of benefit. Other questions in this series will address the 'illusion' that vaccines (basically cow-pus, rotting material and carcinogenic poison) benefit or are 'weak'.

Back to 50+ Q & A

How many lives could the plague vaccine have saved in 1300?

Q.How many lives could the plague vaccine have saved in 1300?
Imagine the lack of sanitation in the 1300's. Garbage thrown in the streets, sewerage too. Water polluted. Food good in Summer, poor or rotting in Winter. A haven for rats and their fleas. The fleas bite each resident of the land on a daily basis. The flea siliva thus inoculates and booster shots each resident on a daily basis. Each individual capable of developing the so called "protective antibodies" would have already developed these "protective antibodies" and thus would have been "immune" according to the theory of immunity so widely aclaimed. Of course, this theory is false and if the residents of 1300 Europe had been vaccinated with a human originated plague vaccine the death toll would have been somewhat HIGHER. Prehaps not a lot higher but it certainly would not have been lower. Think about it. [Why Higher? Because the people's bodies would have been even more toxic, that is polluted with inner 'garbage' of which all vaccines consist. And internal garbage, or more politely expressed, toxicity, is the real cause of so called infectious diseases.]

Following from: Lots of GREAT Vaccination Quotes

"Up to 90% of the total decline in the death rate of children between 1860-1965 because of whooping cough, scarlet fever, diphtheria, and measles occurred before the introduction of immunisations and antibiotics." ---Dr. Archie Kalokerinos, M.D.

"This..forced me to look into the question of vaccination further, and the further I looked the more shocked I became. I found that the whole vaccine business was indeed a gigantic hoax. Most doctors are convinced that they are useful, but if you look at the proper statistics and study the instances of these diseases you will realise that this is not so . . . My final conclusion after forty years or more in this business [medicine] is that the unofficial policy of the World Health Organisation and the unofficial policy of the 'Save the Children's Fund' and ... [other vaccine promoting] organisations is one of murder and genocide. . . . I cannot see any other possible explanation. . . . You cannot immunise sick children, malnourished children, and expect to get away with it. You'll kill far more children than would have died from natural infection." --Dr Kalokerinos MD

Even the WHO (World Health Organisation) has admitted, disease and mortality rates in Third World countries have no direct correlation with immunisation procedures or medical treatment, but they are closely related to the standard of hygiene and diet. A 1973 issue of Scientific American revealed the same finding : that "over 90% of all contagious disease was eliminated by vastly improved water systems, sanitation, living conditions and transportation of food." Mass vaccinations did not appear on the scene until a century after the decline in infectious diseases started (1850-1940), but inoculations were, and still are given full credit. --Susan DeSimone

Back to 50+ Q & A