Vaccination Liberation - Information | |||
Legal: | Science: | Misc: | Searches: |
---|---|---|---|
Exemptions State_Chapter/ Resource_Contacts Avoid_Vaccinations Activism LegalNews |
Introduction Basic_Facts Package Inserts Ingredients of Vaccines Q_and_A Artificially Sweetened Times |
Membership Books Videos Tapes 100+ Anti-Vax links Vax_Cartoons Breaking News Planned_Events |
KeyWord_Index Index/Link_Pages Search_Our_Site Home_Page Index_Page Smallpox Alert! |
Do Not Sign
Basically, some doctors are giving patients who choose not to vaccinate their children a form to sign created by the
American Academy of Pediatrics (AAP). This form varies somewhat from state to state but basically it is a
total propaganda sheet about the alleged
value of vaccines, the alleged "risk" of not vaccinating and, even worse, the parent who signs the form is
falsely "admitting" that they are
putting their children at risk. |
Links to information about T.D.C./TDC
The following excerpts were found on the internet. One rule of thumb is that any restrictions on your 'signature' must be prior to, or before you sign/autograph the document.Threat Duress Coercion Signing Under Duress Say "Under Duress I will comply with your demand." And then autograph the document: Signature Under Duress If one of the parties can prove that the contract was signed under duress, that is, the party's signature was extracted by physical or mental coercion, then the contract is null and void. How to Prove that Documents Were Signed Under Duress Duress is one of the most vague areas of U.S. law, and also one of the simplest. Essentially, duress is the act of forcing another person or party to do something against his or her will, usually with a threat of violence or other harm. Many times, agreements and contracts are signed under duress but there is no proof, or else the victim doesn't realize that he or she can contest the validity of the signed document. But how do you prove that documents were signed under duress? Is the contract fair and equitable? A contract - of any sort - should be a fair and equitable "meeting of the minds", which means that it benefits both parties equally. If a contract is biased toward the other party, you will have an easier time proving that you wouldn't have signed it in normal circumstances. Explain that the documents were signed under duress, and that you don't find a meeting of the minds anywhere in the contract. Signing in protest and under duress V.C., initial and circle. Also the ellipse (...) The use of ellipse When the treat of intimidation or outright rejection of lawful protest is too great, then a second and equally valid method of signing under protest is permitted, namely the use of three full stops placed first, followed by the signature so that the three dots are not obscured by the signature. This is called an ellipse eg "..." and indicates that legally there was a form of words you wanted to state but were unable due to some event, in this case because of threat and coercion. Thus, at the earliest opportunity the ellipse can be revealed and it can be stated that you intended to write V.C. but were prevented therefore nullifying any agreement. More: http://globe-union-court.org/info_roman_court_procedures/info_roman_court_contents.html Helpful article on reserving your rights under the UCC https://adask.wordpress.com/2009/08/09/without-prejudice-reserving-your-rights-under-the-ucc/ |