Vaccination Liberation - Information | |||
Legal: | Science: | Misc: | Searches: |
---|---|---|---|
Exemptions State_Chapter/ Resource_Contacts Avoid_Vaccinations Activism LegalNews |
Introduction Basic_Facts Package Inserts Ingredients of Vaccines Q_and_A Artificially Sweetened Times |
Membership Books Videos Tapes 100+ Anti-Vax links Vax_Cartoons News Planned_Events |
KeyWord_Index Search_Our_Site Home_Page Smallpox Alert! |
Mandates:
Jacobson vs. Massachusetts is based on contradictory logic. ...documents for understanding and fighting mandated vaccination Countering Jacobson v. Massachusetts [1905 SCOTUS ruling] A discussion about the 1905 Jacobson v Massachusetts decision: Click to DownLoad MSDOC file: 253 KB Jacobson v Massachusetts: It’s Not Your Great-Great-Grandfather’s Public Health Law Click to DownLoad MSDOC file: 42 KB Topics: C. Violation Of Constitutional Right To Bodily Integrity D. Violation Of Other Civil Rights And Societal Tenants HTML version: United States Supreme Court Cases & Opinions It is important to note: "he was sentenced by the court to pay a fine of five dollars." The $5 fine, prehaps $100 in 2010 dollars, was judged to be the apt penality for refusing a mandate to accept smallpox vaccination based on a medical objection. Click to DownLoad Microsoft web page archive file, .MHT extention: 156 KB May not work in some browsers and/or word processers, in which case, use the HTML file above. United States Supreme Court Cases & Opinions The disasterous results and legal battle following a case of mandated vaccines Note the down load size 834 KB SusanKrieder-case15.pdf [834KB] More documents on the Constitution Jacobson.pdf The Famous Supreme Court Decision of 1905 [89KB] Some of our thoughts on: A Foundation for and Rebuttal of Mandatory Vaccination Laws mandates2.html (Mandatory Vaccination and the Constitution) mandates2.doc (Mandatory Vaccination and the Constitution) [166KB] MORE AnMed Health Flu Shot Case Link is no longer active: http://attorneyforthestars.com/ Charles Griffin, attorney, has asked the court for an injunction to stop AnMed from enforcing the mandated policy until a hearing is held on the suit. He said, "the state constitution provides that "citizens shall be free from unreasonable invasions of privacy'. Being forced to have an injection or something forced up one's nostrils is clearly an invasion of privacy," Update: Judge: AnMed Employees Must Get Flu Shot http://www2.wspa.com/news/2010/dec/10/6/battle-over-flu-shots-upstate-hospital-headed-back-ar-1188235/ Suggestions to defeat employer mandates |