by Ian Miller | Guest Writer, Published June 10, 2026
The Covid lockdowns may not have been remotely effective, but at least they harmed millions of people and created long-lasting negative impacts that we’re still dealing with today.

That’s the conclusion of a massive new body of research into the nonsensical policies promoted by the public health “expert” class, promoted by their media partners, and enacted by incompetent, cowardly politicians.

Read rest of original story here:

     By Rhoda Wilson on June 5, 2026
Hantavirus does not transmit from one human to another, not even the Andes strain that was said to be the cause of the outbreak on the cruise ship MV Hondius.

The most likely cause of the outbreak was a rodent onboard the ship. “The failure was not letting people off the boat earlier,” Dr. Clare Craig writes.

Read rest of original story here:

     Anne Dachel, May 28, 2026
In January HHS Secretary Robert Kennedy Jr. tried to reduce the number of vaccines on the childhood schedule to more reflect Denmark’s schedule.

Mainstream medical organizations and health officials quickly renounced the change.

Nothing can be allowed to interfere with the ever-expanding, liability-free vaccination schedule.

Read rest of original story here:

     By Ty Bollinger, January 3, 2019
Last week, the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approved VAXELIS, a new 6-in-1 combo vaccine. The new drug, produced as a collaborative effort by pharmaceutical giants Merck and Sanofi, claims to prevent diphtheria, tetanus, pertussis, poliomyelitis, hepatitis B, and invasive disease due to Haemophilus influenzae (H. influenzae) type b.

The vaccine has been approved for infants as young as 6 weeks old and will be administered in a series of 3 doses between 6 weeks and 4 months of age.

As the vaccine schedule for children continues to inflate, we need to start asking better questions. Is this vaccine safe? Is it effective? Are developers adequately testing these drugs before going to market? At 6 weeks, are infants equipped to handle the increasing burden of vaccines being mandated by the Centers for Disease Control (CDC)?

Read rest of original story here:

     Rebekah Barnett, Jun 02, 2026
If a scientific paper offers a counter-narrative conclusion, should it be deleted from the record?

Science publisher Elsevier says yes, if the topic is vaccines, because allowing doctors and parents to read it would pose a risk to public health.

This raises the question: Is censorship of science really the best way to ensure public health and safety?

The paper under scrutiny is a peer-reviewed analysis of three decades of vaccine adverse event reporting data which found that 75 percent of sudden infant deaths occurred within seven days of a vaccination, a statistically significant finding.

Read rest of original story here: Full Text Full Text of original