Vaccination Liberation - Information
Legal: Science: Misc: Searches:
Exemptions
  State_Chapter/
Resource_Contacts

Avoid_Vaccinations
Activism
LegalNews
Introduction
Basic_Facts
Package Inserts
Ingredients of Vaccines
Q_and_A
Artificially Sweetened Times
Membership
Books Videos Tapes
100+ Anti-Vax links
Vax_Cartoons
News
Planned_Events
KeyWord_Index
Search_Our_Site
Home_Page
Smallpox Alert!

Mandates:
documents for understanding and fighting mandated vaccination
A discussion about the 1905 Jacobson v Massachusetts decision:
Click to DownLoad MSDOC file: 253 KB Jacobson v Massachusetts: It’s Not Your Great-Great-Grandfather’s Public Health Law

Click to DownLoad MSDOC file: 42 KB
Topics:
C. Violation Of Constitutional Right To Bodily Integrity
D. Violation Of Other Civil Rights And Societal Tenants


HTML version:
United States Supreme Court Cases & Opinions
It is important to note: "he was sentenced by the court to pay a fine of five dollars." The $5 fine, prehaps $100 in 2010 dollars, was judged to be the apt penality for refusing a mandate to accept smallpox vaccination based on a medical objection.

Click to DownLoad Microsoft web page archive file, .MHT extention: 156 KB
May not work in some browsers and/or word processers, in which case, use the HTML file above.
United States Supreme Court Cases & Opinions

The disasterous results and legal battle following a case of mandated vaccines
Note the down load size 834 KB
SusanKrieder-case15.pdf [834KB]

More documents on the Constitution
Jacobson.pdf The Famous Supreme Court Decision of 1905 [89KB]

Some of our thoughts on:
A Foundation for and Rebuttal of Mandatory Vaccination Laws
mandates2.html (Mandatory Vaccination and the Constitution)
mandates2.doc (Mandatory Vaccination and the Constitution) [166KB]

MORE
AnMed Health Flu Shot Case
Link is no longer active: http://attorneyforthestars.com/
Charles Griffin, attorney, has asked the court for an in­junction to stop AnMed from enforcing the mandated policy until a hearing is held on the suit. He said, "the state constitution provides that "citizens shall be free from unreasonable invasions of privacy'. Being forced to have an injection or something forced up one's nostrils is clearly an invasion of priva­cy,"
Update:
Judge: AnMed Employees Must Get Flu Shot
http://www2.wspa.com/news/2010/dec/10/6/battle-over-flu-shots-upstate-hospital-headed-back-ar-1188235/

Suggestions to defeat employer mandates